Skip to content
Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuits
Understand your legal options and see if your case qualifies for a potential settlement. Federal Lyft sexual assault lawsuits are now consolidated in multidistrict litigation, allowing shared issues to move through one coordinated pretrial process.
- Last updated:
Lyft launched in 2012 as a friendlier alternative to Uber, emphasizing community, trust and passenger safety. But as rideshare use grew, so did reports of sexual assault involving Lyft drivers.
Between 2017 and 2022, Lyft reported (opens in a new tab) 6,809 incidents of sexual assault across five categories included in its safety reports. That works out to nearly four reported incidents per day.
The true number may be higher. Sexual assault is widely underreported, and Lyft’s figures capture only incidents that were reported to the company and met its reporting criteria.
Thousands of survivors have since pursued claims alleging Lyft failed to adequately screen drivers, respond to warning signs and protect passengers from known risks. Lyft has disputed claims that it should be held legally responsible for assaults committed by drivers.
Federal Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuits Are Now Consolidated
In February 2026, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered federal Lyft sexual assault lawsuits from around the country to be consolidated in the Northern District of California. (See the PDF order here (opens in a new tab).)
The panel found that the cases share common factual questions involving Lyft’s passenger safety practices, driver screening and response to reports of sexual misconduct. U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin is overseeing the proceeding.
The federal Lyft MDL now includes about 136 individual lawsuits. Consolidation does not merge those claims into a single lawsuit or class action. Instead, discovery, pretrial motions and other shared issues are handled together before one judge.
The litigation is still in an early stage. Lyft has begun asking Judge Lin to dismiss portions of the plaintiffs’ claims, including negligence theories involving driver background checks and product liability claims involving the Lyft app.
If the cases continue toward trial, the court may eventually select representative cases for bellwether trials. These test cases can help both sides evaluate how juries respond to evidence and may influence future settlement discussions.
Table of Contents (click arrow to expand/collapse)
Were You Sexually Assaulted by a Lyft Driver?
Latest Lyft Sexual Assault News and Lawsuit Updates
November 13, 2026 Lyft Sexual Assault Survivor Reaches Settlement, Advocates for Passenger Safety
Cristen Giangarra, a nurse sexually assaulted by a Lyft driver in St. Louis in 2019, reached a confidential settlement with the rideshare company on June 9, 2026, shortly before her negligence lawsuit was scheduled for trial.
The driver, Larry Ward, previously pleaded guilty to kidnapping and rape. Giangarra is now speaking publicly about the need for stronger rideshare safety protections, particularly driver screening and passenger safeguards.
Her individual settlement comes as Lyft continues defending federal sexual assault lawsuits in MDL 3171, which had 150 pending actions as of November 2, 2026. The agreement's financial terms haven't been disclosed.
October 13, 2026 Lyft Seeks to Narrow Federal Sexual Assault Claims
Lyft asked a federal judge to dismiss parts of the roughly 136 sexual assault lawsuits consolidated in the federal MDL at that time, including negligence claims tied to driver background checks and product liability claims involving the Lyft app.
At an October 14 hearing, Judge Rita Lin expressed skepticism about Lyft's argument that a California regulatory decision on fingerprint background checks should limit traditional negligence claims. A ruling had not yet been issued at the time of this update.
September 15, 2026 Former Lyft Driver Sentenced to Six Life Terms
A former Lyft driver who prosecutors said posed as a rideshare driver to target women leaving San Francisco bars and nightclubs was sentenced to six life terms totaling 150 years to life in prison.
Orlando Vilchez Lazo was convicted on 12 felony counts involving multiple kidnappings and sexual assaults dating from 2013 to 2018. Lyft acknowledged that Vilchez Lazo had previously driven for its platform.
Prosecutors said DNA evidence helped connect several of the assaults after one case had gone cold.
August 18, 2026 $50 Million Lawsuit Filed Against Lyft Over Alleged Driver Sexual Assault
A North Carolina woman filed a $50 million lawsuit against Lyft, alleging the rideshare company bears responsibility after one of its drivers sexually assaulted her during a March 31, 2026 ride home from work.
The plaintiff alleges driver Ryan James Davey took her to a secluded location, forcibly kissed her and exposed himself. Davey was arrested the following day and later indicted on charges including felony kidnapping, sexual battery, indecent exposure and driving while impaired.
The passenger filed her civil lawsuit against Lyft in Durham County on August 11.
The lawsuit raises questions about Lyft's responsibility for screening and monitoring drivers. The plaintiff's attorneys say Davey had a 2015 DWI conviction.
North Carolina law prohibits rideshare companies from approving drivers with certain convictions, including DUI and sexual offenses, within the previous seven years. That conviction may have fallen outside the state's automatic disqualification window by the time Davey drove for Lyft.
However, the lawsuit may still test whether complying with minimum background check requirements is sufficient when a company allegedly knew or should have known a driver posed a risk to passengers.
Lyft said it permanently removed Davey from its platform after learning of the allegations.
Source: Law Commentary (opens in a new tab).
August 4, 2026 Lyft Sexual Assault MDL Grows as First State-Court Trial Approaches
The federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation continued to expand, with 72 cases pending in MDL No. 3171 as of August 3, 2026, according to federal court statistics.
That represented an increase from the 54 federal cases reported in early June. The litigation also entered a more active discovery phase as attorneys addressed how Lyft must search for and produce electronically stored evidence, including internal communications and associated data.
Meanwhile, the first trial involving approximately 2,000 coordinated Lyft sexual assault lawsuits in California state court was reportedly expected to begin in September.
Although the state and federal proceedings are separate, early jury verdicts could influence litigation strategy and future settlement discussions in other pending cases.
June 16, 2026 Idaho Lyft Driver Convicted of Assaulting Passenger
An Ada County jury convicted former Lyft driver Zkaria Mahmmd Al Majzoub on June 5 of first-degree kidnapping and two felony sexual assault charges involving an August 2024 passenger in Boise.
Prosecutors said the driver took the passenger away from her intended route and assaulted her in a remote location.
Friends contacted police after she failed to arrive home and location-sharing data showed her in an unexpected area, allowing officers to locate the driver quickly.
At the time of this update, Al Majzoub was scheduled to be sentenced on September 9, 2026.
The conviction came as Lyft faced 54 cases in federal MDL No. 3171 and approximately 2,000 additional sexual assault lawsuits in California state court.
Source: Breitbart (opens in a new tab).
Older Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Updates
2026 Updates
January 20, 2026 – Federal Lawsuit Filed by Georgia Woman After Alleged Lyft Assault
A Georgia woman filed a federal lawsuit against Lyft alleging she was sexually assaulted by her driver during a September 2025 ride. She alleges the driver stopped the vehicle, exited the car and groped her while she was retrieving items that had spilled from her purse before attempting to unzip his pants. The lawsuit accuses Lyft of failing to provide adequate passenger safety protections and misrepresenting the safety of its service.
January 14, 2026 – Tallahassee Lyft Pickup Leads to Sexual Battery Arrest
A woman reported being sexually assaulted after a late-night rideshare pickup in Tallahassee, saying she lost consciousness after drinking water offered by the driver. A man whose vehicle matched her description was later arrested and charged with sexual battery, according to WCTV (opens in a new tab).
2025 Updates
November 17, 2025 – Colorado Woman Files Federal Lawsuit After Alleged Lyft Assault
A Colorado woman filed a federal lawsuit against Lyft alleging one of its drivers sexually assaulted her outside her home following a July 2024 ride. The complaint accuses Lyft of ignoring known safety risks and criticizes the company's background-check procedures, driver monitoring and opposition to certain rideshare safety legislation.
November 15, 2025 – Massachusetts Bill Seeks to Close Legal Gap Exposed by Lyft Assault Case
A WCVB investigation (opens in a new tab) examined a Massachusetts case in which rape charges against a Lyft driver were dropped because prosecutors were required to prove the driver knew or should have known the passenger was too intoxicated to consent. State lawmakers subsequently proposed legislation that would make it a crime for a rideshare driver to engage in sexual activity with a passenger during a ride.
October 8, 2025 – Plaintiff Seeks Federal Consolidation of Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuits
A plaintiff asked the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate at least 17 Lyft sexual assault lawsuits into a single federal proceeding. The petition (opens in a new tab) requested transfer to the Northern District of California, where plaintiffs alleged common questions involving driver screening, passenger safety and Lyft's response to reports of sexual misconduct.
The request ultimately led to creation of the federal Lyft sexual assault MDL in February 2026.
October 7, 2025 – Arizona Lyft Driver Arrested After DNA Links Him to Two Sexual Assault Cases
Phoenix Lyft driver Mohammad Al Bishawi was arrested after DNA evidence reportedly linked him (opens in a new tab) to two sexual assault investigations, including one involving a rideshare passenger in Gilbert and another involving a massage therapist in Phoenix. He faced charges including sexual assault and kidnapping.
September 24, 2025 – Utah Rideshare Driver Faces Charges in Alleged Abduction and Sexual Assault
Alejandro Rendon Segovia was charged with aggravated kidnapping, object rape and obstruction of justice following a February 2024 Lyft ride in Salt Lake Valley. Prosecutors alleged that he deviated from the intended route and sexually assaulted an intoxicated passenger before she escaped. Authorities said there could be additional victims, according to KSL TV (opens in a new tab).
August 29, 2025 – North Carolina Woman Sues Lyft After Alleged Rape by Driver
A woman filed a federal lawsuit alleging a Lyft driver raped her in Charlotte after she became unconscious from alcohol during a February 2024 ride. The lawsuit alleges Lyft failed to implement adequate safety measures despite knowing about previous sexual assault reports involving drivers, according to The Charlotte Observer (opens in a new tab).
August 11, 2025 – Lyft Drivers Arrested in Massachusetts and New York Sexual Assault Cases
Two rideshare drivers were arrested in separate sexual assault investigations. In Somerville, Massachusetts, Lyft driver Luis Carlos Ramos Teixeira was accused of sexually assaulting a passenger after driving her home from Boston. He was arrested on charges of rape and indecent assault and battery, according to the Middlesex County District Attorney's Office (opens in a new tab).
In upstate New York, Lyft and Uber driver Thomas F. Cipriano was arrested in connection with the alleged sexual assault of a passenger under 15 (opens in a new tab). He faced charges including attempted second-degree rape, unlawful imprisonment and endangering the welfare of a child.
Can Lyft Sexual Assault Survivors Sue the Company?
Yes. Depending on the circumstances, a survivor may be able to bring a civil claim against Lyft after a sexual assault involving a driver.
Claims against Lyft generally focus on the company’s own conduct rather than simply the actions of an individual driver. Lawsuits have alleged that Lyft failed to adequately screen drivers, respond to prior complaints, warn passengers about known risks or implement reasonable safety measures.
Whether Lyft can be held legally responsible depends on the facts of the case and the law in the state where the assault occurred. Filing deadlines can also vary significantly by state.
What Happens If You Request a Case Review?
A case review can help determine whether the circumstances of an assault may support a legal claim and what filing deadlines could apply.
SurvivorsRights.com may connect you with an attorney who handles rideshare sexual assault cases. Completing the contact form does not file a lawsuit or obligate you to move forward with a claim.
If your case is accepted for review, a partner attorney can evaluate details such as:
- when and where the assault occurred
- whether the driver had prior complaints or warning signs
- what Lyft knew or should have known about the driver
- whether the incident was reported to Lyft or law enforcement
- what state laws and filing deadlines apply
Consultations with partner attorneys are free, and submitting the form does not create an obligation to hire an attorney.
How Lyft Sexual Assaults May Occur
Sexual assault involving a Lyft ride can take different forms, including unwanted touching, sexual contact or more serious assaults. Lawsuits and criminal cases involving rideshare drivers have described circumstances such as:
- Passengers who are intoxicated or otherwise vulnerable: Some allegations involve riders who were impaired, unconscious or otherwise less able to protect themselves.
- Detours or secluded locations: Some survivors have reported drivers leaving the expected route or stopping in isolated areas.
- Locked doors or refusal to end the ride: Other cases involve allegations that drivers prevented passengers from leaving the vehicle.
How Many Lyft Sexual Assaults Have Been Reported?
Lyft has publicly disclosed 6,809 reports of sexual assault across five categories for incidents occurring from 2017 through 2022.
In May 2026, Lyft released additional data (opens in a new tab) for that same 2017–2022 period using a broader reporting framework that includes all categories of sexual assault and sexual misconduct under the RALIANCE taxonomy. Lyft said its next Safety Transparency Report will cover incidents reported from 2023 through 2025. Lyft (opens in a new tab)
That means Lyft has not yet published its next full safety report covering 2023–2025. The total number of sexual assaults involving Lyft rides may also be higher than the company’s published figures because not every incident is reported to Lyft.
Lyft’s Sexual Assault Policies and Driver Screening
Lyft says (opens in a new tab) it has safety policies designed to prevent and respond to sexual assault, including driver background checks, mandatory safety education, real-time ride monitoring and a 24/7 safety team. The company also encourages riders to report safety incidents through the Lyft app.
But lawsuits against Lyft allege those safeguards have not gone far enough. Plaintiffs have challenged the company’s driver-screening practices, response to prior complaints and handling of known safety risks.
Among the issues raised in litigation are:
- Driver background checks: Lyft requires criminal background checks, annual rechecks and continuous monitoring, but generally does not require fingerprint-based screening.
- Prior complaints and warning signs: Some lawsuits allege Lyft failed to remove drivers quickly enough after receiving complaints or other indications of potentially unsafe behavior.
- Passenger safety measures: Plaintiffs have also questioned whether Lyft did enough to identify risky drivers, respond to reports and warn riders about known dangers.
Why Fingerprint Background Checks Are Part of the Lyft Litigation
Lyft currently requires U.S. driver applicants to consent to a criminal background check and provide a valid Social Security number. The company uses third-party provider Checkr to conduct the criminal screening and says active drivers are subject to annual background checks and continuous criminal-record monitoring.
Lyft generally relies on biographic rather than fingerprint-based screening. New York City (opens in a new tab) is an important exception because drivers licensed by the Taxi and Limousine Commission must complete fingerprinting as part of the licensing process.
That distinction has become one of the issues in Lyft sexual assault litigation.
Plaintiffs argue that name-based checks can be less reliable when an applicant uses false or incomplete identifying information. At an Oct. 14, 2026 hearing in the federal Lyft MDL, plaintiffs argued (opens in a new tab) that because Lyft does not use biometric screening, its background-check process can end up checking false identification rather than confirming the identity of the person applying to drive.
Lyft, however, argues that its screening process complies with applicable regulations and includes continuing monitoring after drivers are approved.
Critics Have Long Called for Fingerprint Screening
The International Biometrics + Identity Association (opens in a new tab) has previously recommended fingerprint-based background checks for both Uber and Lyft. In a white paper [PDF] (opens in a new tab), the organization argued that fingerprint screening provides stronger identity verification than searches based only on biographical information.
Identity Week (opens in a new tab) quoted IBIA Managing Director Tovah LaDier as saying, “There are significant risks in relying solely on a biographic background check.” She added that biographic searches can be vulnerable to data-entry errors and attempts to use false or misleading identifying information.
That concern is now part of the federal Lyft sexual assault litigation.
Why Has Lyft Opposed Fingerprint Background Checks?
Lyft has historically opposed laws that would require fingerprint-based background checks for all rideshare drivers, arguing that its existing screening system is effective and that fingerprint requirements can create additional barriers for prospective drivers.
The company and other rideshare operators have also argued that fingerprint databases may contain incomplete arrest records that do not show whether charges were later dismissed or resulted in a conviction.
Civil rights groups have raised similar concerns about relying on arrest information that may disproportionately affect some communities.
Supporters of fingerprint screening argue that biometric identification offers an important advantage: it helps confirm that the person being screened is actually the person applying to drive. Depending on the jurisdiction, fingerprint checks can also be compared against state and federal criminal-record databases.
The disagreement is now relevant to the federal Lyft sexual assault litigation, where plaintiffs are challenging whether Lyft’s name-based screening practices provided sufficient protection for passengers.
California Requires Fingerprint Checks for Some Lyft Drivers
California has created a limited fingerprinting requirement for rideshare drivers who transport unaccompanied minors.
In December 2024, the California Public Utilities Commission adopted rules requiring drivers participating in services for unaccompanied minors to pass a fingerprint-based background check (opens in a new tab). The requirement does not apply to every Lyft driver in California.
The rule provides a notable exception to Lyft’s broader use of name-based background screening.
Can Lyft Sexual Assault Survivors Sue Over Driver Screening?
Potentially. A survivor may be able to pursue claims involving Lyft’s driver-screening or passenger-safety practices, depending on the facts of the case and the law that applies.
Current lawsuits have raised arguments involving:
- Negligent driver screening: Plaintiffs allege Lyft should have used stronger screening or identity-verification procedures.
- Failure to respond to warning signs: Some lawsuits allege Lyft did not act adequately after prior complaints or other indications of unsafe behavior.
- Control over the platform: Plaintiffs argue Lyft exercises substantial control over how drivers gain access to passengers and how rides are arranged.
- Other passenger-safety practices: Claims may also involve Lyft’s response to reports, safety features or warnings about known risks.
A lack of fingerprint screening does not automatically make Lyft liable for an assault. A survivor would still need to prove the elements of a legal claim under the law that applies to the case.
Those arguments are now being tested in the federal Lyft MDL, where Judge Rita F. Lin is considering which negligence and product-liability claims may proceed.
Is There a Lyft Sexual Assault Class Action?
No. Lyft sexual assault claims are generally pursued as individual cases rather than as one class action.
Sexual assault claims can differ significantly from one survivor to another, including the circumstances of the assault, the injuries involved, applicable state law and the evidence available. Those differences can make class treatment difficult.
Federal Lyft sexual assault cases are now coordinated through multidistrict litigation, or MDL, but an MDL is not a class action. Each survivor generally retains an individual lawsuit while shared pretrial issues are handled together.
Can Lyft Require a Sexual Assault Survivor to Arbitrate a Claim?
Lyft historically required many disputes to be resolved through individual arbitration rather than in court. In May 2018, however, Lyft announced that it would no longer require arbitration of individual sexual assault or sexual harassment claims. Lyft’s current terms continue to exempt individual sexual assault and sexual harassment claims from mandatory arbitration.
That means a survivor does not automatically have to resolve a Lyft sexual assault claim through private arbitration simply because the company’s broader terms contain an arbitration agreement.
Whether an older agreement affects a particular claim can still depend on when the dispute arose, the terms in effect at the time and applicable law.
Federal Law Further Limits Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault Claims
Congress enacted the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act in 2022.
The law allows a person alleging sexual assault or sexual harassment to reject enforcement of a predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver for a dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after March 3, 2022.
The law also provides that courts, rather than arbitrators, decide whether the statute applies to a particular dispute.
For Lyft survivors, the practical question is usually not whether all sexual assault claims must go to arbitration, but which court, filing deadline and legal theories apply to the individual case.
Legal Options for Lyft Sexual Assault Survivors
The legal options available after a Lyft sexual assault depend on factors such as where and when the assault occurred, applicable filing deadlines, the evidence available and whether Lyft may be legally responsible under state or federal law.
An attorney who handles rideshare sexual assault cases can evaluate those issues and determine whether a civil claim may be available.
The attorneys SurvivorsRights.com works with offer free consultations and handle qualifying cases on a contingency-fee basis. That generally means there are no upfront attorney fees, and the attorney receives a percentage of a settlement or jury award if the case is successful.
Frequently Asked Questions About Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuits
Can I sue Lyft if I was sexually assaulted by a Lyft driver?
Potentially. Survivors may be able to bring claims involving Lyft’s own conduct, such as driver screening, responses to prior complaints or passenger-safety practices. Whether Lyft can be held legally responsible depends on the facts of the case and the law that applies. A survivor may also have claims against the individual driver.
Is there a Lyft sexual assault class action?
No. Lyft sexual assault claims are generally pursued as individual cases because the circumstances, injuries, evidence and applicable state laws can differ substantially from one survivor to another. Federal cases may be coordinated through multidistrict litigation, but an MDL is not a class action.
Is there currently an MDL for Lyft sexual assault lawsuits?
Yes. In February 2026, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated federal Lyft passenger sexual assault lawsuits in the Northern District of California. U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin is overseeing the proceeding.
The MDL allows common discovery and pretrial issues to be handled together while survivors generally retain individual claims. As of October 2026, the proceeding includes about 136 lawsuits. Lyft has begun asking the court to dismiss portions of some claims, including negligence and product-liability theories.
How many sexual assaults have been reported in Lyft rides?
Lyft has publicly disclosed 6,809 reports of sexual assault across five categories for incidents occurring from 2017 through 2022. The company has also released additional safety data covering that period under a broader reporting framework.
Published figures do not necessarily represent every sexual assault involving a Lyft ride because not every incident is reported to the company. Lyft has said its next Safety Transparency Report will cover incidents reported from 2023 through 2025.
Can Lyft require a sexual assault survivor to use arbitration?
Lyft announced in 2018 that it would no longer require individual sexual assault and sexual harassment claims to be resolved through mandatory arbitration. Federal law enacted in 2022 also allows people with qualifying sexual assault or sexual harassment claims to reject certain predispute arbitration agreements.
Whether an older arbitration agreement affects a particular case can depend on when the claim arose, the terms that were in effect and applicable law.
Can I still pursue a Lyft claim if I did not immediately report the assault?
Possibly. Not reporting an assault immediately to Lyft or law enforcement does not automatically prevent a survivor from pursuing a civil claim. An attorney can evaluate the available evidence, filing deadline and other circumstances surrounding the case.
How long do I have to file a Lyft sexual assault lawsuit?
Filing deadlines vary by state and by the circumstances of the claim. Some states provide longer deadlines for sexual assault claims or special rules for people who were minors when the abuse occurred.
Because statutes of limitations can be complicated and exceptions may apply, survivors considering legal action should determine the deadline that applies to their individual case.
What compensation may be available in a Lyft sexual assault lawsuit?
Depending on the facts and applicable law, damages may include compensation for medical or counseling expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, emotional distress and other losses connected to the assault. Punitive damages may also be available in some cases, but they are not awarded in every lawsuit.
Will I have to testify in court?
Not necessarily. Many civil cases resolve before trial. If a case does proceed to trial, testimony may be required depending on the evidence and legal issues involved. An attorney can explain what participation may be expected at each stage of the case.
How much does it cost to hire a Lyft sexual assault attorney?
The rideshare sexual assault attorneys SurvivorsRights.com works with offer free consultations and handle qualifying cases on a contingency-fee basis. That generally means there are no upfront attorney fees, and the attorney receives a percentage of a settlement or jury award if the case is successful.
How do I start a Lyft sexual assault case review?
You can begin by completing the confidential case review form. Submitting the form does not file a lawsuit or obligate you to move forward. If appropriate, SurvivorsRights.com may connect you with a partner attorney who can evaluate your legal options.